Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Time for Accountability for Rehtaeh Parsons - My letter to the Minister of Justice Ross Landry
Dear Ross,
I write to you out of concern, frustration, and sadness over the incidents that lead up to the untimely death of Rehtaeh Parsons, a 17 year old that was taken off Life Support on Sunday evening after being raped, bullied, and cyber- bullied by schoolmates of Cole Harbour High.
My concern stems from the Crown Prosecutor’s decision to not press charges against the 4 boys who raped Rehtaeh even though a photo was circulated to other students of Cole Harbour High. With all the technology and the ability to trace the IP addresses or MAC addresses of computers, I am puzzled that our integrated police service took so long with their investigation. Moreover the time span during the investigation it took to interview the alleged rapists. This is unacceptable. Our Police Services need to address such heinous crimes in a timely manner and to conduct interviews of suspects in a timely manner! Allowing months to go by without interviewing a suspect is absolutely unacceptable.
This brings me to my frustration; with respect to the lack of action by the High School Faculty, the Principal, and the Halifax Regional School Board Member/ School Board. How could this type of bullying, cyber-bullying be unnoticed? Teachers are not immune to gossip and student issues.
The response from the Crown Prosecutor’s Communications person, Chris Hansen, was is just spin-doctor gibberish to deflect the genuine reality that Justice was not served.
My sadness is derived from the disappointment that Rehtaeh has perished without justice being served and that her family has been let down by the Government Agencies that are supposed to protect its citizens. The 4 boys have gotten away with their horrific actions. The High School has not fostered an anti-bullying program. The Police and Justice Services have failed the citizenry of our community.
I formally request a full review of this case and that the 4 alleged rapists are brought to justice. The Parson family have had to endure so much heartache and they need closure. Personally, I am requesting this review for all the young women who are venerable to such crimes. Please have your staff investigate the Todd case in British Columbia and the amendments adopted there with respect to Bullying.
Preventing another rape, bullying and subsequent death of a youth is in your hands.
Dawn Marie Sloane
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Bravo Min. Jennex! HRM, smarten up and save our Neighbourhoods!
The problem with the school review is that
in HRM's case it is killing established communities by forcing children to go
to schools outside of their neighbourhoods which then cause the deterioration
of walkable sustainable communities/ neighbourhoods. As the typical amenities
are closed down or relocated, neighbourhoods lose their uniqueness, pride, and
functionality. Families move and communities deteriorate, crime become rampant,
and other businesses and or amenities move.
Communities suffer when the wrong choices are made with
respect to the closing of community amenities. Children no longer walk to
school= obesity. Eyes on the street= the feeling of being in an unsafe
environment = crime. The more people move out of the established neighbourhoods
the more it costs us all in taxes (to pay for the relocation of amenities and
the price of new infrastructure such as sewer and water).
Our water bills are going up because of this
"shift", deferred maintenance to our infrastructure is occurring
which means we are going to see an increase to water bills (as stated on the
news last night) that will not even come close to the $$$$ required to keep the
system to a optimum working conditions.
We need to plan properly. HRM has allowed for leapfrog
development ( spot development outside of the serviced area which requires the
basic services - police, fire, snow removal etc) which has made our growth uncontrollable.
HRM by Design tried to remedy this but Council was weak and didn't take the
really necessary steps to curb the leapfrogging.
Moreover, if the correct housing developments and affordable (
a sliding scale affordable housing) was enacted, people could live within the
serviceable area which would decrease the infrastructure costs, allow for the
existing amenities to be utilized to their capacity ( money saving) and allow
for the local businesses to thrive as the population would use the local shops
in a walkable community scenario.
The other issue is the amount of money HRM gives to the
developers to build the services HRM will take over after the development is
concluded - otherwise known as capital cost contributions. HRM needs to revise
this policy and adopt the policies Harry Kitchen and Enid Slack proposed to HRM
which stated that Developers need to start adding a % of the infrastructure
cost to each house built outside of the serviced area. We as existing taxpayers
should not be subsiding new growth that perpetuates the closure of schools,
decline of neighbourhoods, and the loss of community.
HRM Council needs to learn the word NO and to revise the
planning documents so we can rebuild our urban environment so we aren’t wasting
money on services that are too spread out to provide at a reasonable rate.
It's really just common sense. You cannot expect an elastic to
stretch beyond its capacity and not break. Our elastic (HRM coffers) is
starting to fray and deteriorate. The breaking point is nigh! Look at all the money being spent on transit and new
overpasses, while our older areas are not being maintained properly.
Are people using
transit? No. Only a certain sector, yet HRM build
overpasses, underpasses to aid the pressure of new development and the almighty vehicle...
typically one person vehicles. Planning our region and using the fund for
infrastructure properly should be the catalyst to change, but I fear there are
too many fingers in the pot.
If the greater good is not seen as the objective, then we will
continue to spiral out of control...
taxes, infrastructure costs ( for maintenance and for new) will increase
and this wonderful place will drive people to other municipalities that are
more affordable.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Valentines…..Shhhmalentines
As a 45 year old single woman, I really can’t stand all this hype over Valentine’s Day. Frankly I just don’t understand why one day out of 365 is so important to those that have found a mate. Notice I didn’t say soul mate, lover, or better half. I will embellish on this soon enough.
Personally, I think it you have a partner, male or female; you should feel love, compassion, and trust 365/24/7 and not just show it on one day. Mind you like any friendship or relationship there will be days when you want to take a cheese grater to the others face or flush the toilet while they are showering… it’s human nature to not be “ in love” 365/24/7. We all can get on each other’s nerves.
With that being said, this day originates from a grizzly event, and I choose not to participate for several reasons which I will not elaborate on as it is really none of your business. I’m a realist and believe that the more you promote a made up holiday, the more you exclude those that are a huge part of our populace. Marriages are not the norm these days. The Church hasn’t the control it had before on our daily lives and I’m not going to delve into that issue, but I will say that if anything we as humans should be celebrating our individuality and ability to be kind to each other and not this ploy to sell greeting cards, flowers, candy, and whatever else people give on this supposed event.
As a society we need to stop with the hype and move toward love and compassion 365/24/7. One nice deed a day to a fellow human, animal, or plant could make this world a better place for all of us, so why are we still allowing this marketing ploy to dictate our lives? It’s a money maker. It generates high expectations from those we admire or hope to be admired from. It plays on our insecurities and causes doubt to creep into our minds that if we do not have a person we think enough about to spend money on, then we are dysfunctional and perhaps not good enough to be loved. We all deserve to feel needed, wanted and loved with or without another in our lives.
Well sisters and brothers, I say stand up and say no more! We are all worth something and we do not need someone else to prop you up or to make you feel good about ourselves. For example today I bought the Germination Station so I could grow fresh greens which I plan on sharing with my friends and neighbours. I was happy to treat myself to something that I will be able to share. Make random acts of kindness not so random. Make them your new mission!
Please think over my thoughts… I’m sure I will get flack for this blog.
Friday, January 4, 2013
Blue Jays, Cranes and the rise of the Phoenix
While
feeding the 5 bluejays that frequent my backyard every morning, I could hear
the rattling of cranes and thought to myself progress has come to Downtown
Halifax. Several people have asked me but why did it take so long and what is
the fate of those that have hung on awaiting this to occur?
![]() |
| New Central Library |
During my
tenure on Regional Council, so many projects were approved (many hotly
contested), yet we are only seeing movement now. Some blame the past Council, others blame the
developers. In actual fact; I believe it
is the realization that the HRM By Design Secondary Plan is finally being taken
seriously.
From 2000
to June 16, 2009, Halifax Regional Council struggled with development
within the oldest part of the municipality.
Developers would ask for huge exceptions to the existing municipal
planning strategy and expect Regional Council to comprehend their rationale to
challenge the plan. Unfortunately, one exception to the Municipal
Planning Strategy became the normal occurrence and the battle over heritage/
height/design became so intense that it seemed Regional Council was constantly polarized
which media, businesses, and citizens blamed on the Elected Officials.
Yes, planning documents need to be never ending working
documents so that they are kept in line with desires of the citizenry/business,
but not to the point of ignoring the rules all together. There is an avenue which
allows for changes to be adopted to a development plan called an amendment. This
allows for planning strategies to be revised through several steps: public
input via public information meetings, first reading (allows for Regional
Council to either move the revision to a Public Hearing or nix it), and then
the debate on the Council floor. This
allows for healthy dialogue between the public and the Elected Officials which
should aid the Elected Officials with their decision- making.
Thankfully HRM By Design has made this antiquated procedure the
way of the DoDo. With the input of thousands
of citizens, developers, and businesses; the Secondary Plan is in the hands of
a group of volunteer professionals who comprehend the intent of the plan and
review the proposed developments which has diminished the waiting time for
developments.
So if that is the case, why did it take so long for these
developments to get going? It’s called
reality! This is not a game of Sim City! As a former draftsperson, I know first hand how long it takes to compile and action a project.
Assembling funding, detailed designs, and working through permits and other
documents/approvals for water, sewer, electrical takes abundance of man hours
from all aspects.
So now we are seeing the results of what seemed to be a
lifetime of meetings, public input, and heated debates. So why are businesses closing? What is
causing this mass exodus? Several people on my Facebook have chimed in on this
topic with several theories. Here is one example of why we are losing good
businesses on Barrington Street.
Many of the businesses, the independently operated, lease
space for their businesses and the owners are jacking up the rent to the point
they cannot sustain themselves. One such
business which was an awesome little antique/art gallery/restaurant was
Elephant’s Eye. The owner decided to
renovate, but this caused the business to shut down during renovations only to
then have to close permanently because the owner raised the rent.
The loss of Dacane Surf Shop, Extreme Pita, Oddjects, and Captain
Sub/Greco Pizza and Elephant’s Eye in the past 30 days makes you wonder if Barrington
Street will every bounce back. Well, it
will. Just like Gottingen Street and
Spring Garden, Barrington will reinvent itself but it will be at the cost of
our entrepreneurs that have awaited some aid with the resurgence of the
downtown core. These shops, bars, and
restaurants had faith in our downtown and waited patiently for the citizens to
discover their unique businesses and now, now they could hold on no longer (
depending on their circumstances of course – just generalizing) If the rents
continue to climb where will our energetic entrepreneurs go? Will they leave Halifax for greener
pastures? Many have already done so
unfortunately.
The old adage “with progress comes change”, let’s hope that
during this change, those that have contributed to keeping the Downtown alive
are able to hang on just a little longer.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Public Trust - Must Not a Bust
I have
procrastinated enough. It’s time to
write a blog on public trust. I’ve been
thinking about this a lot, and what is there to say about public trust?
I think the
polls say it all when it comes to public trust.
37% of the electorate voted in the last municipal election. This is the same number as the last election
of 2008. So why wasn’t there a total overhaul of Regional Council? The
media and polls strongly suggested people wanted a dramatic change to their
municipal government, yet only three seats actually changed in the election.
Could it
have been the inconvenience? Due to the change in boundaries, there were
changes to many poll locations. To save
money, Council agreed to the elimination of advanced polls by paper ballot
hoping the electorate would take advantage of the two weeks of internet and
phone voting. Moreover Election days were moved to Saturdays to allow for
easier access to vote. Or was it just plain
apathy?
I’m thinking
it’s the last. Apathy seems to be
rampant within all levels of government these days. I believe it boils down to
public trust. A large percentage of the population have lost faith in the
system and can you blame them? No.
At the municipal level, politicians are not
really in control with the day to day operations of the municipality. The issue stems from the fact that our elected
officials are strangled with legislation from past provincial government
decisions. In Halifax Regional Municipality’s case; they are ruled by a report
known as the Hayward Report. Written in 1995 for immediate action in 1996, the
report outlined the newly amalgamated Municipality’s governance model which empowered
the bureaucrats and emasculate the elected officials.
William Hayward the author of the report himself was a bureaucrat and really didn't understand the complexities of municipal services and the roles the citizens wanted their representatives to govern. With the adoption of this governance model, several things were left out of the framework, starting with the support of the citizens and businesses for the change. Out of 3 amalgamations, only one was truly backed by the electorate, and it wasn’t Halifax, Dartmouth, Bedford or the former counties; it was Queen’s Regional Municipality.
William Hayward the author of the report himself was a bureaucrat and really didn't understand the complexities of municipal services and the roles the citizens wanted their representatives to govern. With the adoption of this governance model, several things were left out of the framework, starting with the support of the citizens and businesses for the change. Out of 3 amalgamations, only one was truly backed by the electorate, and it wasn’t Halifax, Dartmouth, Bedford or the former counties; it was Queen’s Regional Municipality.
With so much
opposition to amalgamation, I believe the citizenry were so turned off; they
lost interest in any of the details like the governance model. Do you blame them? I certainly don’t, but I do blame the lack of
educating of the public of this model on the municipality. By not educating the
electorate, their expectations of good governance are dashed constantly because
the rules favour the process and policies of former “strategic plans”,
“planning strategies”… etc. Does the
bureaucratic machine have too much power and those elected not really educated
in the rules surrounding government? I think it’s a little of both.
While at a
Federation of Canadian Municipalities Conference a few years ago, I noticed
that Calgary has a great program in place for educating their citizens. Run by Community and Neighbourhood Services City Hall School
is available for school children from grades 3 to 12 the opportunity to be
educated on the operations and political side of City Hall. A city educating
their future citizens could be broaden to include newly landed immigrants or
citizens that would like to know more about civics. Why can’t Halifax introduce something like
this?
I brought
this idea up at Regional Council many times, but unfortunately I had no
support, so I’m challenging this New Council to pick up this idea and run with
it! Seriously, if we want a change in
the percentage of voters, more civic pride, and more citizen participation; you
need to foster, educate, and work with the citizens.
On a closing note, public trust is a two way street. Yes, government needs to gain the citizens’
trust by acting in good faith, but citizens have to stop being so bloody
apathetic! Change only happens when
everyone participates as a team. I know,
I’m cheerleading here… but if we want better government, we have to
participate, push our elected officials, and request change, not just for the
sake of change, but to make our communities better for all.
Next Blog: TBA
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Boxes Aside... Benefits of Community Councils and How to Save Small Municipalities
I was going
to write a quip about the things I uncovered while sorting through the 12 years
of reports, thank you letters, requests, and material brought back from
conferences, but I have decided to change gears due to two opinions that were made
regarding how our municipality should be governed and the issues towns
throughout Nova Scotia are facing.
The first
opinion was tweeted last night. It thoroughly enraged me as the comments
were completely incorrect regarding the role/governance, and use of Community
Councils. Many may ask “what is a Community Council?” A Community
Council is a smaller body of Regional Councillors which represents areas which
are physically adjacent to each other or have similar planning, geographical,
and community similarities. For example: on the peninsula the former four
districts (11, 12, 13, and 14) were known as the Peninsula Community
Council. The four Councillors met once a month publically to discuss the
areas of concern for these four districts on topics such as variances to the
Municipal Planning Strategy (MPS) with respect to development or additions to
dwellings or planning applications for their area, concerns brought forward by
businesses or residents of these Districts or Staff related files within the
areas (such as park upgrades).
Although
these meetings were public, not many residents or businesses attended unless
they had a beef with a development or a neighbour’s proposed request for a
variance. Some groups did take advantage of the ability to present their
questions, comments or requests to the Community Council, but it was never a
packed house.
The
abilities of a Community Council over the past 16 years have not been modified
nor used to its potential under the Municipal Government Act (MGA) or the
Halifax Charter (basically a carbon copy of the MGA with amendments focused on
Halifax and its required need for changes to the legislation to allow for
better governance on matters such as planning (example HRM by Design).
What irked
me regarding the tweet last night is the person basically said it was “another
level of government that we do not need”. Well, I absolutely disagree; in
fact, this IS the type of government we need, but has been underutilized,
never fostered, or funded properly to make it all of what it should be, the
venue for community engagement, citizen consultation, and local grass roots
governance.
While
studying the different forms of local government, I learned about several
models of governance under which Canadian municipalities can govern. The
closest comparison to what Halifax Regional should be governed is;
Toronto. Unfortunately, William Hayward (the bureaucrat charged to design
the governance for Halifax Regional in 1995-96 by the Provincial Government of
the time) didn’t go into great detail on the aspects of governing, only to
point out that the Chief bureaucrat shall have ultimate authority over the
operations of the Municipality, Regional Council (including the Mayor) would be
like a Board of Directors dealing with the adoption of policy and amendment
requests to the Province. Hayward’s approach to the use of Community
Councils was quite vague, thus the proper usage of this government body is weak
and not as effective as it could be.
Toronto on
the other hand, uses its model of Community Councils properly or I should say
better than Halifax Regional. First of all Toronto is set up as a Two
Tier system ( Halifax Regional is 1 Tier) which gives authority and the ability
for Community Councils to actually work. Instead of compiling the
Community Councils by geographic likeness, Toronto broke them in to categories:
Urban, Suburban and Rural. Toronto also allowed these Community Councils
to establish budgets for localized work operations (parks, neighbourhood
improvements etc.) as opposed to everything going to the full Council ( Halifax
does this currently). We have all witnessed how polarizing effects of
Urban versus Suburban /Rural over the years have caused controversy at Halifax
Regional, so I won’t delve into that drama.
How will
the Community Councils evolve for this new Council? I’m not privy to any
information, but I hope that they decide to do it correctly and follow
Toronto’s example. Furthermore, I hope the Provincial Government with get
off their butts and start working with the Halifax Regional on revising/
amending the Halifax Charter to allow for a better form of governance that will
be for the betterment of all areas of the municipality.
The second
opinion piece that grabbed my eye was published in the local newspaper.
It described the failing towns of Nova Scotia in the more rural areas.
Interestingly enough, the Province has been aware of this issue since the early
1970’s (Graham Report). During a Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities’
conference, the state of the province’s population shift was presented and
demonstrated their forecast, and the issues that would arise within the next
10, 15, 20 years. Basically, the population would be attracted to the
more urban areas and this would cause financial hardship to the smaller
municipalities. As stated in the opinion piece, Canso was the first
victim and more to follow if a creative solution is not incorporated.
The “A”
word (Amalgamation) is not the answer, but joint service agreements between
small towns and counties may bring a little relief. This would allow for
communities to retain their identity, and share resources, manpower, and
establish joint capital projects to enhance the quality of life for the current
and/or future businesses and citizens.
There is a
huge need for creative solutions: tax breaks to companies to relocate to an
area or a main street. For this to succeed, our Province and Federal
Governments need to accomplish a few things: the connectivity whether it be
digital or physical must be made a top priority. The Broadband rollout promised
years ago must be completed, and stable transportation choices (buses, train,
and roads in good state of repair) must allow residents and businesses to
transverse without the fear of delay or safety issues. It’s a sign of the
times; no one will relocate to an area that does not offer such minimal living
requirements.
Ok, enough
ranting. I have a linen closet to clean out.
Next Blog:
Public Trust
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
The Ironic Twist Fate Throws at You
Fate. Some people think that everything in life happens for a “reason”. Perhaps it does. I’m not discounting any theories these days. I just know that a few weeks ago I gave the graduating class at Eastern College (approx. 1500 people in attendance) an inspirational speech on the premise you never know what your future has in store for you.
I told them of how
an unknown community member somehow became a community activist after
experiencing a disturbing incident while walking back to work one lunch hour,
how this activated the activist in her. Her passion for helping our area was
noticed by her neighbours and she was asked to run in the next municipal
election. The activist was elected 3 times to represent her community and was
now seeking a fourth term. This is where the Ironic Twist of Fate comes
in….my political career ended days later.
Now it’s time for Double Irony… cue the “Jeopardy Music”…
Last week I was
awarded Best Councillor by the readership of The Coast for the 10th consecutive
year in a row for which I am extremely proud of. So am I missing something
here? Winning such an awesome award, but not getting elected… WTF? Talk
about mixed messages. Reminds me of the guy you dated for 10 years, but he’s
really in love with someone else and they are getting married tomorrow.
This led me to
thinking; is our life’s path predetermined or do we make our own destiny? Are
there glaring neon directional signs that perhaps we do not see or want to
acknowledge? Denial is just not a river in Egypt me thinks. (Yes, I
know it is spelt Nile.) Do others see what our future hold for us? Will they
share their info and advice with you or just let you fall into that lion pit
like Yosemite Sam??
Case and point: a friend invited me to a church service the other Sunday. Although I am not the best of company to anyone these days, I decided to go. Thought it might give me a soulful boost. I was informed it non-denominational fellowship and that I may find some of the practices different. I didn’t think it would be an issue as I have always enjoyed experiencing various cultures, religions, and respect all who practice any spiritual practices. In fact my Great Grand Father started a non- denominational church in Clearwater, Manitoba at the turn of the last century.
The Spiritual
Science Fellowship describes itself as “Federally Chartered
Inter-Faith Association providing spiritual services, educational programs and
Pastoral Ministrations for persons regardless of their religious background,
who desire to understand experiences of Psyche and Spirit.”
The members are
very friendly and inviting. I appreciated that their hymnal included
contemporary music like Imagine and On Top of the World, and the
meditational time which allowed for a very calming reflection time. Something
I really haven’t done for quite some time. Only one problem, my cell
phone was on silent, but I had the alarm set for 7:30 pm to remind me to take
my antibiotics for my pneumonia. As the congregation began to slip
into meditation mode…. The Theme for Laverne and Shirley started rising up
throughout the hall. Somewhat relaxed, I didn’t realize it was my
phone until “we’re going to make our dreams come true” was wailing quite
loudly. I grabbed my purse and ran into the hall to shut it
off. Just a little bit embarrassing to say the least. I
then rejoined the meditation session with the phone completely shut off.
The next part of the service
included a messaging exercise. My friend told me that the Ministers
would pick individuals out of the congregation and ask them if they would like
to receive a message. A physic message. If you say yes, the Minister
will either hold your hand or just begin to give you your message. As
the first Minister delivered messages, I was relieved that I had not been
chosen. I just wanted to be an observer, a fly on the
wall.
The second Minister then got up and delivered a few more messages and then approached me. She asked me if I wanted a message, and I was reluctant at first but thought what the heck. What could she tell me that I don’t already know about myself? She took my hand and proceeded to describe her vision. “I see you polishing… repeatedly polishing shoes.” Uh? Shoes? What does this have to do with me, am I going to work in a shoe store like Al Bundy?
She then told me “You keep repeating
the same task. You need to stop blaming yourself. It isn’t your
fault. You have so much to give and you feel defeated. Don’t
blame yourself. You need to heal.” Well, I was
floored. She said a few other nice things which I can’t recall as I
was weld up with tears by then. The conclusion of the service
included the joining of hands and singing of Kumbaya. Yet irony enters….I
always told the previous Council we needed to do this, but it never happened.
As I left the hall, I began to digest
the message. It wasn’t my fault. The shoes were an
analogy for my rehashing of the campaign. I then recalled a famous quote: “Insanity: doing the same thing
over and over again and expecting different results.” Albert Einstein Do I believe a guy who had a perpetual bad hair day? I’m
not going to tempt fate. Time to move on….
Next Blog: Odd things inside the
boxes
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
